WHILE it is patently clear that HUSSEIN Obama is Islam’s best American friend (at least its most powerful, and the list of his like-minded surrogates – inside and outside the Beltway – is too lengthy to cite), the whys and wherefores are widely unknown.
SO if we start out with how he raises up Islam on the one hand, and shields it on the other, we veer closer to the whys and wherefores. Thus, it is the recommendation of this site to commence here…
Since he first appeared on the national political scene in 2007, Barack Hussein Obama has done everything in his power to protect Islam from any and all criticism. While he claims to be a practicing Christian, he has continuously and deliberately misrepresented the truth about the violent, supremacist nature of Islam. Obama has consistently denied that the obligation of true Muslim believers, as they are taught in the Qur’an and Hadiths, is to convert, subjugate, or kill all non-Muslims until Allah’s religion (Islam) is the only religion for all of mankind.
Sadly, convincing most Americans to open their eyes to the truth about Islam is not an easy task. Using a combination of deceit, political pressure, and the threat of condemning critics of Islam as racists or Islamophobes, Obama has managed to successfully control the conversation about Muslims and Islam. How then will loyal Americans who cherish freedom and respect the Constitution confront the “most powerful man in the free world” to expose the lies and reveal the tyrannical aspirations of authentic Islam?….continue your journey here….
WITH the above in mind, it becomes clearer as to why he ordered “Presidential Study Directive 11”, a little known push towards “regime change” in the Mid East F/B/O ensconcing Brotherhood Mafia leaders into top political posts!!
Behind the rise of ISIS, the Libyan Civil War, the unrest in Egypt, Yemen and across the region may be a single classified document.
That document is Presidential Study Directive 11.
You can download Presidential Study Directive 10 on “Preventing Mass Atrocities” from the White House website, but as of yet no one has been able to properly pry number 11 out of Obama Inc.
Presidential Study Directive 10, in which Obama asked for non-military options for stopping genocide, proved to be a miserable failure. The Atrocities Prevention Board’s only use was as a fig leaf for a policy that had caused the atrocities. And the cause of those atrocities is buried inside Directive 11.
With Obama’s typical use of technicalities to avoid transparency, Directive 11 was used to guide policy in the Middle East without being officially submitted. It is possible that it will never be submitted. And yet the Directive 11 group was describedas “just finishing its work” when the Arab Spring began.
That is certainly one way of looking at it.
Directive 11 brought together activists and operatives at multiple agencies to come up with a “tailored” approach for regime change in each country. The goal was to “manage” the political transitions. It tossed aside American national security interests by insisting that Islamist regimes would be equally committed to fighting terrorism and cooperating with Israel. Its greatest gymnastic feat may have been arguing that the best way to achieve political stability in the region was through regime change.
What little we knowabout the resulting classified 18-page report is that it used euphemisms to call for aiding Islamist takeovers in parts of the Middle East. Four countries were targeted. Of those four, we only know for certain that Egypt and Yemen were on the list. But we do know for certain the outcome.
Egypt fell to the Muslim Brotherhood, which collaborated with Al Qaeda, Hamas and Iran, before being undone by a counterrevolution. Yemen is currently controlled by Iran’s Houthi terrorists and Al Qaeda.
According to a New York Times story, Obama’s Directive 11 agenda appeared to resemble Che or Castro as he “pressed his advisers to study popular uprisings in Latin America, Eastern Europe and Southeast Asia to determine which ones worked and which did not.”
The story also noted that he “is drawn to Indonesia, where he spent several years as a child, which ousted its longtime leader, Suharto, in 1998.”
The coup against Mubarak with its coordination of liberals, Islamists and the military did strongly resemble what happened in Indonesia. The most ominous similarity may be that the Muslim mobs in Indonesia targeted the Chinese, many of whom are Christians, while the Muslim mobs in Egypt targeted Coptic Christians….continue reading the horrific truths….
ALL of which wends us straight back to the Islamist-in-Chief’s ultimate crime against America, that which could not have been facilitated without his purposeful upending and wildfires in the already fiery Mid East, and parts of Africa alike. It is into this cauldron of hell-fire – which hasn’t abated in over 5 years – that Allah’s Muslim Terrorists – ala the Islamic mandate of hijrah…migration for the cause of Allah – are slithering through the front door and back door as “refugees” into the heretofore greatest democracy in the world!!
HUSSEIN Obama, the devil incarnate.
PATRIOTS, is there any punishment too harsh to “repay” him for his crimes against the American people – as well as others – who have suffered due to infinite blow back via concomitant knock-on effects? Not on this end….
(BTW, shackles should be the starting point, with a firing squad at the ready. After all, certain crimes mandate capital punishment, and this is a good thing. Why should he – or his main surrogates – be immune for manifestly GRAVE crimes against the people?)
WE are not done yet. Incontestably, the aforementioned back door must be highlighted for what it is. Not only that, what you think you know about what is happening in front of your (already horrified) eyes is barely the tip.
They will go by the name HIAS, Inc instead of the Hebrew Immigrant Aid Societywhich is probably better anyway since they have so many Muslims to resettle (who probably got skittish when they heard the word “Hebrew”). According to Mark Hetfield: The word “Hebrew” is so outdated, like using the word “colored” to refer to African-Americans.
Though they are officially “non-profit” organizations, Catholic Charities, Lutheran Social Services, and several other Christian organizations are profiting from lucrative contracts with the federal government to resettle refugees in the United States.
In FY 2015, the State Department, through the Bureau of Population, Refugees and Migration and the Office of Refugee Resettlement, spent more than $1 billion on these programs, which settled international refugees “vetted” by the United Nations High Commission on International Refugees in all 50 states and the District of Columbia. The federal government spent hundreds of millions of dollars more than that on refugees, however. The Department of Health and Human Services also provided a number of “entitlements” to these refugees.
Five of the top nine VOLAGs are Christian non-profits. The other four are Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society, International Rescue Committee, US Committee for Refugees and Immigrants, and the Ethiopian Community Development Council.
After providing three to four months of resettlement services to these refugees, having been well compensated for their assistance services, these Christian non-profit VOLAGS stop providing services and are not required to keep track of their location within the United States….continue reading about
LO and behold, as promised, let’s segue to the “back door”!
About 100 Syrian refugees are being placed in a small city in Vermont, the home of socialist Sen. Bernie Sanders, and they are not getting an altogether warm welcome.
In fact, when residents of Rutland, Vermont, found out about the secretly negotiated deal to seed their community with migrants from a Middle Eastern hotbed of Sunni radicalism, they were livid.
They packed a local library for an “informational” meeting Thursday night. At least 20 of them stood outside with protest signs, demanding that their mayor explain why he negotiated the entire deal with the federal resettlement contractors behind closed doors and outside the purview of public scrutiny.
Mayor Chris Louras simply “announced” on April 26 that 100 Syrians were being “welcomed” into the city after it was a done deal.
Even the Boston Globe acknowledged the Rutland refugee placement was “developed in near-secrecy” by the mayor and the government contractor.
The U.S. government is desperately looking for new locales to send the Syrians as it ramps up its “surge” of more than 350 Syrian arrivals per week in an effort to meet President Obama’s goal of 10,000 Syrians resettled by Oct. 1.
And in each new town that gets told, not asked, that Syrians are coming, the response has been divisive, with some locals saying they welcome the foreign “diversity” and others saying they have questions and fears.
Another 75 refugees are headed to small communities in northern Nevada, it wasreported by KUNR, an NPR affiliated radio station.
Northern Nevada International Center, which operates on the campus of the University of Nevada at Reno, has been given the green light to start a refugee resettlement program. Carina Black, the group’s director, told KUNR the group’s application to become an official resettlement contractor was approved in February, meaning the plan has been in the works since at least late last year. But the local residents are only now finding out about it.
“Stakeholders” from health care, education, employment and faith communities have been “coming forward and showing a huge interest in helping us,” Black said. “So we’re still basically conducting a lot of training … and getting ready for this new endeavor.”
Black said her organization will resettle up to 75 refugees over the fiscal year that begins Oct. 1.
Black did not return calls to her office Friday by WND seeking more information.
What the NPR affiliate failed to report is that once a resettlement contractor opens an office in a community, it never closes. If the pattern of other communities holds true, they start with 75 refugees the first year, followed by at least that many next year, and the next, and the next.
Rutland is a city of a little over 16,000 people in a liberal state that has never received refugees before, let alone from Syria. It doesn’t have a single mosque.
The Boston Globe reports, “[T]he resettlement would begin in October and gradually send Rutland more Syrian refugees than are currently living anywhere else in New England. The influx would be a jolt of instant cultural diversity for Rutland, where there are no mosques and no other Syrian immigrants.”
That’s all about to change. Fully 98 percent of the 4,019 Syrian refugees resettled in the U.S. since January 2012 have been Sunni Muslim.
And many of the residents aren’t happy….continue readingthe entire deceptive disaster here….
BESIDES, what kind of leadership behaves this way, other than fascist ones akin to third world dictatorships? Exactly.
MOST significantly, this investigative journalist – via intel gleaned from reliable Mid East contacts, who have yet to steer wrong – states for the record: unequivocally, HUSSEIN Obama is not only an Islamist sympathizer and ideologue, but he is a “made man” within the ACTUAL Muslim Brotherhood Mafia!
THUS, when certain Egyptians write about these matters, trust, they are spot on. Why? Well, not because they say so, that’s for sure. Rather, because said claim has been independently verified by this site, that’s why!
BEFORE we delve any further, let this investigative journalist be inordinately clear: there is a well-orchestrated and concerted effort to silence alternative media, one which is beyond the (murderous) pale. Yes, you read that right! Just hang on….
NOT only that, whether it involves silencing counter-jihadists or those who speak out against multi-pronged FED overreach, the dangers – and the concomitant battle lines – to national patriots and America’s Constitutional basis are one and the same.
WHAT are the chances that a select group of hard-core investigative journalists and “banksters” too – privy to the most explosive secrets imaginable, be they so-called liberals or conservative-bent professionals – simply drop dead, one after another?
IN this regard, a quickfire method to shut down hot-button truth-telling conversations is to accuse the individual of being a conspiracy theorist. As such, most folks become duly reticent and cease talking. Finito.
INDEED, there are so many wild conspiracies flying around that it is hard to keep up. On the other hand, when proof after proof piles up in one definitive direction – plus other measurable quantifiers start to add up – well, ignoring said evidence is just plain crazy.
IN this regard, how shocking is it to find out that part of the silencing extends to incarceration, ala political prisoners akin to third world juntas? But in order to square the circle, so to speak, let’s review some recent backgrounder(s).
HOW many understand that Obama Inc.’s manipulative (echo chamber) narrative surrounding the recent assassination of Lavoy Finicum – and it was an assassination – resulted directly from FED overreach, and the need to shut down all dissent re the government’s land theft (not just re the Bundy Ranch) and related matters, setting up Finicum as an example? And isn’t said measure akin to a Mafia-like template too? If not, why not?
The paper has some newly released video, appended at the end of this post, that syncs external video with video shot from inside the truck Finicum was driving with four other passengers, chronicling the last minutes of Finicum’s life.
We see and hear when first stopped by agents—both FBI and Oregon state troopers were involved—that Finicum wanted to continue on to the city of John Day in Grant County for a planned community meeting which he seemed to think would involve the sheriff there.
He tells the officers who first stopped them that that’s what he intends to do and invites them to either follow him there or to just kill him right now. “You want a bloodbath, it’s going to be on your hands…I’m either going to be laying down here on the ground with my blood on the street or I’m going to see the sheriff,” he said.
He drives off around 4:30 of the video below until hitting the roadblock that leads him to zoom off road to the left.
This newly released video, shot from inside Finicum’s vehicle, does indeed, for those who want to blame Finicum for what happened, literally show him telling the agents that they might as well “go ahead and shoot me” when he’s out of the car and right before they fire the shots that kill him.
But the most interesting and damning thing the video makes clear is that agents started shooting at him, twice, before any of the “appearing to reach in his pocket for a gun” that supposedly justified the kill shots. See starting around 5:30 of the video.
So, there is something for the “narrative” for everyone: those who insist Finicum basically wanted to be shot have his reckless behavior and his shouted goading to the agents.
Those who insist the cops were illegitimately out to kill him from the start have the evidence that they began shooting him just as he exited the vehicle and long before any apparent “reaching for a gun.”
If you want to hear frightened people praying for their life in a truck as cops keep shooting at them, both gas rounds and what seem to me to be bullets, watch/listen to the whole video below.
Recall these people knew they were being shot at from the start, and that their friend who left the truck was shot dead, if you ask why they didn’t just peacefully exit the truck.
And as the Oregonian reports, even Justice Department officials grant now there was very possibly something untoward about the whole process:
An FBI agent is suspected of lying about firing twice at Robert “LaVoy” Finicum and may have gotten help from four other FBI agents in covering up afterward, authorities revealed Tuesday.
The bullets didn’t hit Finicum and didn’t contribute to his death, but now all five unnamed agents, part of an elite national unit, are under criminal investigation by the U.S. Justice Department. Inspector General Michael Horowitz is leading the independent inquiry….
Investigators gave no details to explain why the one FBI agent, a member of the Hostage Rescue Team, wouldn’t report the two shots. They also didn’t indicate what his four colleagues on the team did to warrant investigation other than saying it was related to conduct after the shooting.
NO doubt, a political based assassination. Period.
SIMILARLY, others have become entrapped within this government vortex, and former Marine Jon Ritzheimer is a prime example. See here….here…and here. Yes, it is into the insidious quagmire (starting with the Bundy Ranch stand-off) of continuous FED overreach that the regime also snatched up Jerry DeLemus, a Tea Party activist and known Trump supporter!
SO upon familiarizing yourselves with the above, isn’t it clear that said arrests smack of illegal misconduct and a national outrage? Even more so, patriots are arrested for standing tall, yet, Black Panther/Black Lives domestic terrorists roam free to destroy the nation! Is this okay with millions of patriots? Know that to be silent IS to agree.
Reporter Pete Santillihad his hearing in Nevada on Monday on trumped up charges he is facing for his reporting on the Bundy Ranch Siege in 2014. As he left the courtroom in chains, he cried out, “I’m a journalist. This is what they do in Communist China!”
Peter Santilli, a conservative Internet talk show host, lost another bid for freedom Monday while he faces felony charges in the criminal case stemming from the Bunkerville standoff.
Following a hearing, Chief U.S. District Judge Gloria Navarro said she did not buy Santilli’s argument that he was a journalist covering the April 12, 2014, armed confrontation between the Bundy family and law enforcement. He hosts the Internet-based “Pete Santilli Show” from Cincinnati on YouTube.
WOW, Obama Inc., the west’s most brazen regime, as it covers all bases to silence all forms of dissent; from patriotic activists to journalists! Yup, it’s now a “crime” to even report on issues of grave national consequence.
ALAS, the questions before us are multi-faceted:
When a regime feels brazen enough to permanently eliminate truth-tellers, what other lengths would they go to in order to silence like-minded dissenters?
Concomitantly, doesn’t said fascist and murderous behavior, inevitably, result in the round-up of all those who “threaten” to change the status quo, or, heaven forfend, shine a spotlight in a very public way via the Constitutional right to peacefully protest?
And, what happens when the regime is so out of control that the only option left is to stage a sit-in, until their (patriotic) voices are heard?
Consequently, are said protests no longer allowed in Obama’s “Amerika”, and will patriots continue to tolerate third world-like regime tactics?
CONSEQUENTIALLY, is the First Amendment dead and buried in America, or not?
The right to protest is a perceived human right arising out of a number of recognizedhuman rights. While no human rights instrument or national constitution grants the absolute right to protest, such a right to protest may be a manifestation of the right tofreedom of assembly, the right to freedom of association, and the right to freedom of speech.
WHEN a nation loses its moral compass, resultant, its center of gravity tilts off course. Intrinsically, it sheds its core basis. And akin to individuals who view no distinction nor (im)moral equivalence between good vs evil, up becomes down, and black becomes white. Inherently, all actions become “equal.” Thus, how can one claim that (heretofore designated) murderers are any less “righteous” than those who act to apprehend them, and so on and so forth? Topsy turvy-like.
SO it is into this Alice in Wonderland – through the looking-glass inverted prism – “reality” that patriots find themselves, when attempting to right wrongs undermining America’s Constitutional foundation. Effectively, steering the ship of state should no longer be left to those who failed to execute their sworn duties. It is that simple. That clear.
BUT before we get to the latest, let’s hark back to the tarring, the threats, and the continuous harassment against counter-jihadists from officialdom and their surrogates, for daring to point out the obvious: the Muslim Brotherhood is a bonafide Islamist Mafia, hence, it must be banned in America! Full stop.
BE that as it may, out of the gate, featured commentaries (throughout 2012 and onward) revolved around Congress’s utter refusal to label the MB as a terror organization, despite volumes of documentary evidence given to Reps (mind you, by certain associates within), which shored up the inextricable linkage between the MB and worldwide terror. Bullet proof.
The United Kingdom declared the Muslim Brotherhood a terrorist group after an 18-month study ordered by British Prime Minister David Cameron — and the Obama administration slammed the document as flying in the face of the Brotherhood’s history as a “nonviolent Islamist group.”
SO what else is there to say? Plenty.
STILL yet, before the following positive news (keep your fingers crossed that it actually takes place) is noted, it must be perfectly understood: party politics, self-interest, is behind the recent sign-ons by certain Reps, rather than an “awakening” to the out-sized national dangers due to the Muslim Brotherhood Mafia’s influence peddling in Washington. For the record, the very same evidence has been ignored for years, so why are they jumping on board now? Exactly.
The number of House co-sponsors ofThe Muslim Brotherhood Terrorist Designation Acthas mushroomed from 28 in February to 49 as of the end of April. The legislation, introduced by Rep. Mario Diaz-Balart, R-Fla., now officially has bipartisan support, with two Democrats signing on as co-sponsors: Rep. Gene Green, D-Texas, and Rep. Collin Peterson, D-Minn.
In a key development, the House Judiciary Committee recently voted, 17-10, to send the bill to the House floor. Though it’s not clear when a full chamber vote will be held, the GOP leadership under House Speaker Paul Ryan supports the legislation.
Meanwhile, a companion bill introduced in the Senate by former presidential candidate Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, now has five key co-sponsors: Sens. Orrin Hatch, R-Utah; Ron Johnson, R-Wis.; James Inhofe, R-Okla.; Pat Roberts, R-Kan.; and Jerry Moran, R-Kan. Johnson chairs the Senate Homeland Security Committee and is a member of the Foreign Relations Committee.
Hatch and Cruz sit on the Senate Judiciary Committee, which is expected to mark the bill up. It will also need support from the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, chaired by Sen. Bob Corker, R-Tenn., where it is currently stalled.
If enacted, the legislation would freeze Brotherhood assets and effectively outlaw its front groups, which number in the hundreds inside America.
U.S. organizations identified in the text of the bill as radical Muslim Brotherhood front groups, citing U.S. Justice Department criminal court documents, include: the Council on American-Islamic Relations, the Islamic Society of North America, the North American Islamic Trust and the Muslim American Society. In effect, CAIR, ISNA, NAIT and MAS would be designated as foreign terrorist organizations with enactment of the bill.
Already, the Muslim Brotherhood has been banned in Egypt, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates. The UAE has specifically designated Washington-based CAIR and MAS as terrorist organizations.
Brotherhood entities in America have raised millions of dollars for the terrorist group Hamas. The most famous case involving Hamas terror-financing was the Holy Land Foundation (HLF) trial in 2008, which ended in convictions and imprisonment of several of its leaders.
FBI case agents across the country have found elements of the Brotherhood showing up in virtually every terrorism case they have worked, including the 9/11 attacks and the Boston Marathon bombings.
The pro-jihad Brotherhood gave rise to Hamas and al-Qaida, and shares ideology with ISIS.
Formally designating the Brotherhood a terrorist organization would not only deny U.S. admission to any foreign national tied to it, but force banks to block financial transactions related to it. What’s more, it would make it a crime for any person in the U.S. to provide material support to the Brotherhood.
This, in turn, would criminalize the hundreds of Brotherhood front groups – as well as mosques – in the U.S. that the FBI says secretly support and finance terrorism. It would allow the agency to use racketeering and conspiracy laws to put them all out of business, while turning off a major spigot of jihadi funding flowing in the American Muslim community.
The bill explicitly identifies several mainstream, supposedly “moderate” U.S. Muslim organizations as Brotherhood entities, and cites evidence tying them to the Brotherhood and its Palestinian terrorist wing Hamas.
“Federal prosecutors implicated a number of prominent United States-Islamic organizations in this conspiracy, including the Islamic Society of North America(ISNA), the North American Islamic Trust (NAIT) and the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR),” the text of the Senate bill states.
“These groups and their leaders, among others, were named as unindicted co-conspirators. The Department of Justice told the court that these United States-Muslim Brotherhood affiliates acted at the direction of the international Muslim Brotherhood to support terrorism in a July 2008 court filing,” which revealed:
“ISNA and NAIT, in fact, shared more with (the Holy Land Foundation) than just a parent organization. They were intimately connected with (HLF, now a convicted terrorist front) and its assigned task of providing financial support to Hamas.
“CAIR was later added to these organizations. The mandate of these organizations, per the International Muslim Brotherhood, was to support Hamas.”
The FBI says the Brotherhood’s goal in the U.S., according to secret documents that agents uncovered after 9/11, is to carry out a “grand jihad in eliminating and destroying (America) from within.”
Former FBI Director Robert Mueller has testified that “elements of the Muslim Brotherhood both here and overseas have supported terrorism.”
Even so, the Obama administration continues to claim the Brotherhood is a “moderate” group and meet with its leaders, even inviting them to the White House.
As former FBI agent Mike Rolf acknowledges in “Muslim Mafia,” CAIR has had “a number of people in positions of power within the organization that have been directly connected to terrorism and have either been prosecuted or thrown out of the country.”
According to another FBI veteran familiar with recent and ongoing cases involving CAIR officials, “Their offices have been a turnstile for terrorists and their supporters.”…continue reading….
CLEAR as a bell, as it has been for years.
NOW, while the above (possible) terror designation is long overdue, how does it jive with the Pentagon’s doctoring of military reports, essentially, covering HUSSEIN Obama’s lame-ass directives re ISIS?
SO while ISIS…ISIL…goes from strength to strength throughout the Mid East and beyond (while amassing a solid footing in America, yes, related info is passed on via a network of this site’s counter-terrorism contacts, hardly gleaned from open source), again, the Pentagon’s outright denials – re ISIS gaining any stepped-up force strength – doesn’t jibe. In other words, isn’t said (lying) pronouncement at cross swords with Congress’s attempt to outlaw (defang) the MB in America? Hang on, it gets worse.
A senior analyst in the US Central Command’s (CENTCOM)Joint Intelligence Office (J2) accused her superiors of reassigning her to a different position on trumped up charges after she spoke up against doctored intelligence reports in the organization.
Carolyn Stewart had previously accused her superiors of changing reports on the Islamic State to fit the official White House line that the war against the self-proclaimed Caliphate is being won, according to The Daily Beast.
Officially, Stewart was transferred for cursing.
Last Wednesday, she brought her case before a Department of Defense appeals court against her civilian superior, Gregory Ryckman. The court attempted to determine whether Stewart’s swearing, which allegedly took place on two occasions, created a “hostile work environment” and therefore merited the transfer.
The Daily Beast’s senior national security correspondent Nancy Youssef writes “if cursing were really a fireable offense in the military, every soldier, sailor, Marine, and Defense Department civilian would have to be sent home.”
Ryckman and his military superior Major-General Steven Grove were accused by other analysts of tampering with intelligence reports in order to spin the war as positiveand of pressuring analysts to suppress negative news and report positive news.
A leading Iraq analystidentified as Gregory Hooker filed a complaint against his superiors in September 2015, as reported by The New York Times.
His superior, William Rizzio had a meeting with Grove and Ryckman in which he reportedly supported claims made by Hooker and others. Following the meeting he was temporarily reassigned. Witnesses to the meeting told The New York Times he was punished for siding with the analysts.
More than50 intelligence analysts working for CENTCOM signed on to support Hooker’s complaint. “Many described a climate in which analysts felt they could not give a candid assessment of the situation in Iraq and Syria”The Daily Beastreported. “Some felt it was a product of commanders protecting their career advancement by putting the best spin on the war.”
By turning reality on its head and brandishing ABUAJ— an educational, humanitarian group of concerned patriotic Americans from all walks of life that strives to raise public awareness about the very real threat of terrorist cells and jihad in our country — as the arbitrator of hate,public attention and scrutiny are diverted away from the real cause and threat, the true victims of violence and hate are easily silenced and dismissed, and the genuine sources of violence and hate emerge as both victors and victims, while risking the safety and lives of all Americans.
As purveyors of biased misinformation, hate, propaganda, and fear, rather than information and facts, the media, by and large, represents one of the greatest security threats we currently face in Western society. Such is the case with The Daily Star, a daily morning newspaper based out of Oneonta, New York, which has painted our group with broad sweeping strokes that warp the public’s view of reality to the extent that we as the messenger have become the news, the story itself, and the target of its attack.
Like MOA, Jamaat ul-Fuqra (or “Community of the Impoverished”) was founded by the terrorist and Pakistani cleric Sheikh Syed Mubarik Ali Shah Gilani (aka “Jilani”), who the American journalist Daniel Pearl attempted to interview in Pakistan before he was abducted and later beheaded in 2002. Although he has vehemently and repeatedly denied any connection to it, he is irrefutably identified as the founder and leader of Jamaat ul-Fuqra in Appendix B of the 1999 U.S. Department of State report, Patterns of Global Terrorism, which describes it as a terrorist organization that “seeks to purify Islam through violence” and has ties to numerous terrorist cells located in North America and the Caribbean. Its members refer to themselves as “Soldiers of Allah.”
The report also links members of Jamaat ul-Fuqra to the purchase of isolated “rural compounds” in North America, to dozens of terrorist acts against those who they regard as enemies of Islam — including Muslim apostates and Hindus — and cites that U.S. members have been “convicted of crimes, including murder and fraud.” Other reports link ul-Fuqra and Gilani to a “network of 45 paramilitary training camps in the US and Canada,” as well as to Al Qaeda (see here and here).
Instead, The Daily Star asserts the position to stand by the members of MOA at Islamberg, which is a mantra repeated again and again like a line of refrain from a poem, in “Islamberg Deserves Our Support,” its oped that oddly neglects to disclose the author . . .
We stand with Islamberg.
This is the message we would like American Bikers United Against Jihad to hear on May 15, if they bring their message of hate to the local area during what they are calling a 'Ride for National Security.'
We do not stand with these people.
We stand with Islamberg. . . .
In attempting to silence discourse and advocacy for political action, The Daily Star takes an isolated incident against MOA members at Islamberg to portray them as victims and to unfairly pigeonhole ABUAJ as haters, when nothing is further than the truth. This is first conveyed by Mahoney’s following email to us but repeated again in all of The Daily Star’s pieces about us and our ride . . .
To organizer(s) of the May 15 event near Islamberg --
I am a reporter for The Daily Star newspaper in Oneonta, NY. Delaware County falls within our coverage area. I recently learned of the "Ride for National Security" event planned for May 15.
Is there a representative of your group whom I could interview?
Please provide me with a telephone contact, or call me at the number below.
Also, please provide me with any estimates you may have of the number of people planning to attend, and whether you have heard from any law enforcement entitities [sic] regarding the plans.
I have also covered very recent litigatioin [sic] by Muslims of America against Robert Doggart et al. If you would like to comment on that, we culd [sic] discuss that as well. [Emphases added]
The Daily Star
At first glance, it appears rather straightforward and benign, but we were immediately struck when we reached Mahoney’s last two lines about Robert Doggart as a glaring red flag of his own possible bias.
For those unfamiliar with Doggart, he ran for Tennessee's fourth U.S. congressional district in 2014 as an independent candidate. He was later arrested in May of 2015 and indicted by a federal grand jury in July of 2015 for plotting to burn down buildings and kill Muslims in Islamberg, New York.
As we explicitly stressed to Mahoney in our emailed response below, there is absolutely no association between ABUAJ, the “criminal” case and conduct of Robert Doggart, and the purpose of our Ride for National Security passed Islamberg . . .
Dear Mr. Mahoney,
It immediately concerned us that you referenced the Robert Doggart et. al matter, when there is absolutely no comparable parallel between our peaceful objective for the ride and his criminal conduct. We have been extremely clear in our promotion of the ride that our sole purpose is educational only, and we do not condone infringing upon anyone's rights whatsoever.
While we are more than glad to speak to you about our ride, we would appreciate your objectivity, journalist integrity, and assurance that you have not already cast us in the same negative light as was warranted by Robert Doggart's actions.
We look forward to your response.
Ram, Co-founder ABUAJ
Our effort was of little consequence. Although he went through the motions to contact both sides for a seemingly “balanced” approach, it is abundantly clear that Mr. Mahoney, who never replied, had little interest in communicating with us beyond our initial exchange. Nor has he shown a particular interest in reporting our comments with the objectivity, intellectual honesty, and journalistic integrity that we had requested from him.
That same day, April 4 (and without our consent to publish our email to him), Mahoney took creative liberty to exploit our message and intent and released his piece, “Biker Group Plans Rally Against Local Muslims.” Similarly, on May 6, 2016 he sent us the following email requesting our comments for another “news” story that he purportedly was still in the throws of “preparing” but had not yet sent to press.
The Problem with Mahoney’s request is that The Daily Star specifically promotes itself as a “daily morning newspaper,” but he asked us for our comments at 3:42 p.m. on May 6, presumably after his story already was printed. For this reason, we were slightly put off when we read in his piece that “[a] representative of American Bikers United Against Jihad did not respond to an email request from The Daily Star for comment on this story.” Neither did he to us.
The next day, May 7, 2016, we followed up with the email below to inquire about Mahoney’s deadline for press.
It is no wonder Mahoney failed to respond. Nor is his somewhat alarming title, “Local Police Brace for Biker Rally at Muslim Hamlet,” which he clarifies when he explains that police will be braced for potential problems from traffic but not for “public safety concerns.”
The organizers of the event,” Mahoney writes, “have been using Facebook and YouTube to spread information about the ride. Their postings repeat unsubstantiated reports by the Christian Action Network, a right-wing group, that residents of Islamberg and other Muslim settlements in this country are poised to wage ‘violent jihad against innocent Americans.’"
Does Mahoney even bother to fact check his sources, or does he rely solely upon the opinions and comments he requests by email but sometimes fails to obtain?
Mahoney’s statements above regurgitate the same talking points that are espoused by MOA and the April 12th oped. By labeling and demonizing the Christian Action Network (CAN) a “right-wing group,” he reduces our national security to no more than a partisan issue and discredits the veracity of our sourced information but without supporting his own claims with sourced information himself. This is an insult to our intelligence, as well as to his readers, and a typical tactic employed by the radical left-wing press (a term we use flippantly here to stress the flagrant hypocrisy) to marginalize and silence the truth. It is also discriminatory, hateful, and tremendously shoddy, irresponsible journalism that misleads the public with false information that could imperil the safety of the public he is supposed to serve and begs the question: What standard does Mahoney apply to substantiate his own reports?
The April 12th oped is even further reaching when it states that ABUAJ’s claims are “tired” and derived from “arch-conservative videos and articles found online.” Does the fact that information may or may not be obtained from a conservative source or the “far-right-wing media,” as the oped implies, make it any less true and substantive?
“And it is our hope,” the oped contends, while lodging what could be perceived as a veiled threat at our group,
that anyone else who stands with Islamberg will be waiting for the American Bikers United Against Jihad when their 'Ride for National Security' pulls up to the gates of the hamlet.
It is our hope that this protest against what can only be described as a peaceful enclave is greeted with a counter-protest demonstrating that the people of our area, particularly those in Hancock and Deposit, stand with Islamberg.
There is still some good that could come from this whole thing. If the riders who might travel to Delaware County in May have the opportunity to see for themselves that Islamberg is not the bogeyman depicted by the far-right-wing media, perhaps they will leave with a more enlightened view of the whole thing.
Are the FBI and State and Justice Departments far right-wing, arch-conservative sources, since there is an abundance of primary source records from them that substantiates both CAN’s and our reports, but The Daily Star must not have bothered to check first.
Of course, the best defense is always a better offense, as is exhibited in a 2013 MOA propaganda video, Targeting Islam and Muslims in America, which accuses “front organizations” for Israel (a code word for Jews) — such as Martin Mawyer’s organization CAN and the Klu Klux Klan — of spreading “Islamophobia” and conspiring to destroy Muslims, among other things.
It is also plausible to surmise that Mahoney’s false portrayal of us has unduly provoked the involvement of the NAACP, which will be busing protesters from Oneonta to Islamberg for our ride. According to Mahoney, a retired political science professor at the State University College at Oneonta, has been “working with the Oneonta chapter of the NAACP in countering the biker [ABUAJ’s] rally.”
This is further elaborated upon in The Daily Star's May 1, 2016 “news” story, “Islamberg Spokesman: Stand Up Against Hate,” by Jessica Reynolds, who reported on an event that was held at the Unitarian Universalist Society in Oneonta and hosted by officials of the local chapter of the NAACP to “dispel” misconceptions about MOA and “show support for area Muslims.” Unlike Mahoney, she never approached us for comments, but — quoting Rashid (“Carl”) Clark, the mayor of the Muslim enclave, Islamberg, and the statements of NAACP officials — she echoes the same "tired" details about Doggart and unfounded claims about us and our ride . . .
The biker group has asserted that Islamberg is a training site for those aspiring to wage jihad, and says the rally is intended to be 'educational.'
But people should not be singled out and targeted for who they are or what they believe in, according to Regina Betts, vice president of Oneonta’s chapter of the NAACP. Because of this, Betts said, plans are in the works for area supporters to assemble alongside members of Islamberg on May 15 so that the bikers will see a peaceful and united front as they drive by.
'We’re doing this in order to assure our neighbors in Islamberg that we are not going to be silent, and that we are not going to tolerate hatred,' Betts told the audience. 'The main thing is that we fight discrimination and that we do it peacefully.'
'There are more children than there are adults on Islamberg,' Clark told the audience Sunday. 'So when people [like Doggart] threaten to come and chop us up with machetes, they’re mainly threatening children. ...On May 15, when the bikers claim they’re going to drive by, we hope to stand against hate.'"
It is important to note that our ride is not a “rally” or “protest,” as it has been improperly dubbed by The Daily Star. ABUAJ is comprised of law-abiding individual American bikers and citizens — most of whom are parents, veterans, and professionals with children, families, and jobs to uphold — and our message too is of peace through national security. Mahoney, Reynolds, and, respectively, The Daily Star have unnecessarily put them at risk by stoking the flames of hate, anger, and fear with their own glaring bias and propaganda.
Granted, Mahoney’s recent story is less inflammatory than his first, “Biker Group Plans Rally Against Local Muslims,” but both essentially cover the same erroneous grounds, and he misleads the public about the nature and goal of our ride by stating in both that “[t]he group has been . . . billing [emphasis added] it as a ‘Ride for National Security.’"
It first must be said that our group is not “against” Muslims, as the above title denotes, which sets the overall tone, once again suggesting Mahoney’s own inherent bias, not that of ABUAJ. Nowhere in any promotions about our ride do we subscribe to this view, and we are not merely “billing” it as a “Ride for National Security.” It is a ride for national security.
Although the MOA compounds are not identified by name in the Patterns of Global Terrorism report, a 2005 Homeland Security report directly links it and its compounds to Jamaat ul-Fuqra. This was further confirmed during the 1993 trial of Glen Ford, an ul-Fuqra terrorist involved in a 1991 bomb plot in Canada who testified that Gilani convinced the U.S. branch to change its name to MOA.
Similarly, a 2006 intelligence report by the Regional Organized Crime Information Center (ROCIC), which was funded by the U.S. Department of Justice, makes no distinction, stating that Jamaat ul -Fuqra receives significant funding for terrorist operations from MOA and its offshoot, IQOU, which, like MOA, was founded by Gilani as a U.S. nonprofit organization.
When Gilani first formed Jamaat ul-Fuqra in 1980, he reportedly began “preaching against Western culture” at Al-Farooq Mosque in Brooklyn, New York, and “primarily targeted black American Muslim converts from the inner city, mostly those with criminal backgrounds.” According to the ROCIC report, there are currently at least 35 suspected Jamaat ul-Fuqra communes with over 3,000 members throughout the U.S. Islamberg in Hancock, New York, is identified as the first of them to be established by Gilani and his American recruits. Their structure is described as typical of “classically structured terrorist cells” and its members as terrorist extremist — but more on this later and back to our ride and Mahoney’s first hit piece on us . . .
Again, our May 15th Ride for National Security passed Islamberg is not a “protest” or “rally,” as it has been falsely and unfairly dubbed by The Daily Star. It is one of many other peaceful and lawful methods that ABUAJ has chosen to educate the American public about the ever-increasing threat of terrorism in America and abroad, and, in this particular case, to proactively advocate for the State Department to reclassify groups such as Jamaat al-Fuqra as foreign terrorist organizations to safeguard our homeland and Americans of all stripes — Muslims and non-Muslims included.
To be fair, it would be remiss not to mention that Mahoney included most of our initial email to him in his first story about our ride. Nevertheless, by taking our statements out of the proper context — juxtaposing them to his statements about Doggart, as is done in all four of The Daily Star pieces about us — he has distorted our genuine intentions, inflaming an undeserved climate of hate and fear. His titles alone connote bias, conjuring pejorative stereotypical images of American bikers and fueling the flames of animus for future relations between us, the Hancock community, and American Muslims in general.
Obviously, our group and our ride are notagainst Muslims, local or otherwise. Rather, we stand in solidarity with American Muslims and non-Muslims alike against the very real threat of terrorism, which is an issue that should concern and unite every American.
Mahoney later contends that the organizer of the ride “sought to put distance between the organization and Doggart,” when, in reality, the need to do so would not even be an issue if he had not brought up the subject himself to begin with, most egregiously placing ABUAJ in the same context and light as Doggart. Like the gift that keeps giving, it is a theme that he and his newspaper resound each and every time the topic crops up.
Suffice it to say, Mahoney and his colleagues and friends at The Daily Star seem to have had their own agenda in mind all along — to instill in the people of Hancock, New York, a sense of unwarranted fear with a fallacious, hate-filled message about ABUAJ and our ride and with a not-so-subtle association between us and Doggart, when no such connection exists.
"Muslims of America," Mahoney goes on to write in his first story, "in announcing the lawsuit against Doggart, noted that 2015 was ‘a violent year for American Muslims amid increased Islamophobia.'” No doubt it was, but it had little to do with a rise in “Islamophobia.”
While the statistical verdict is still out for 2015, the latest FBI hate crime statistics from 2014 show that the largest group of victims from religiously motivated hate crimes was Jewish, making up 56.8 percent of the total victims compared to 16.1 percent of religiously motivated crimes against Muslim victims, which is a 40.7 percent difference. Unfortunately, MOA leaders have a long, documented history of promoting such hate against Jews themselves (also see here and here). This is aptly conveyed in a September 2002 MOA propaganda video, which was written by Sheikh Gilani, produced by IQOU at Islamberg, New York, with the Directorate of Information of the MOA, and later obtained by The Clarion Project.
As depicted below, MOA accuses the “Zionist media” of “releasing a reign of media terror to destroy the American Muslims” and of a conspiracy to destroy the world. In other MOA and IQOU literature and propaganda, which are documented in official law-enforcement reports, the Jews are compared to “Satan,” and Gilani has been caught on film at what was referred to in one official report as a “roundtable of terrorists” that included Osama Bin Laden chanting, “down, down with the USA! Down, down with the CIA,” and “death to the Jews” (see here, here, and here for examples). The film now remains in the CIA’s possession as part of the dossier on bin Laden, which is known as the “Alex File.”
Either way, violent Islamic terrorist attacks against Muslims and non-Muslims alike have risen exponentially throughout the world, and MOA is correct to point out that Muslims make up the majority of its victims. The National Counterterrorism Center found that in 2011 alone Muslims themselves suffered between 82 and 97 percent of the fatalities related to Islamic terrorism, but that figure is significantly higher than recorded in most other and more recent reports (see here, here, and here). Figures on Islamic terrorism against Muslims, or any other religious group for that matter, are somewhat sketchy, since reporting methodologies and data collection are generally based on news reports and aggregated according to geographical regions and terrorist groups rather than by religion.
We also are in full agreement with Mahoney when he relays a March 21 statement by MOA, noting that "Muslims of America declared: 'We must use all legal means available to stop the terrorization of people based on their faiths for any reason.'" This is precisely the same reason ABUAJ is hosting a ride that focuses on national security — to improve upon law enforcement’s ability to uphold and enforce our nation’s laws. In fact, to assure the safety and peace of mind of everyone concerned — so that no faith or group from either ABUAJ or the community of Hancock at large feels the slightest bit threatened — we have been in direct communication with the local New York State Police department, who will be present during our ride passed Islamberg.
Even before the second hit piece about us was released by The Daily Star, we had already posted and promoted guidelines for our May 15th ride. As is illustrated below, our ride is not a rally or protest but for educational purposes only. ABUAJ will be riding passed Islamberg on a public state road that runs perpendicular to Muslim Lane, where the complex is located, but we will neither be stopping at its entrance nor trespassing on its property. We have instructed all participants that Islamberg is a private, gated commune and that women and children reside there and to be mindful and respectful of that.
Up to this point, Mahoney might have had one or two valid points, but his argument goes sorely awry as he continues,
Muslims of America describes itself as a population of primarily African American Sunni Muslims. the group says it has a long history of fighting against disinformation about its activities.
Following the assault on various sites in Paris last November, the head of Muslims of America, Hussein Adams, issued a statement declaring his group has no affiliation with the Islamic State and condemned its activities.
'Muslims are not terrorists, we are the No. 1 victims of terrorists,' Adams said then.
'Muslims are being slaughtered by these people who are perpetrating their devastation in the name of Islam in order to instigate chaos in the world. And yet, here at home in America, Islamophobes are wasting time harassing American Muslims who have not harmed anyone. The American Muslim community has co-existed here peacefully for decades.'
It is here where both Mahoney and the head of MOA, Hussein Adams — as well as MOA's Mayor, who Reynolds’ quotes in her story — begin to whitewash some of the more painful realities of terrorism, jihad in America, and the history of MOA itself. We cannot overlook this without correcting the record.
First, as noted above, we understand and agree that Muslims are the primary victims of Islamic terrorism, which, based on terminology alone, discredits the notion proclaimed by MOA that Muslims are not terrorists. Second, ABUAJ never once associated MOA with ISIS, which makes its above-quoted contention an irrelevant, mute issue. Third, we reject the entire premise of Islamophobia, which is akin to the pot calling the kettle black after MOA’s long, sordid history of hatred towards other groups.
Yet, it stands to reason that MOA also would casually wave around and promote the term like CAIR. After all, its general counsel, Tahirah Amatul Wadud, was recently appointed to the board of the Massachusetts chapter of CAIR. As reported by Ryan Mauro, National Security Analyst for The Clarion Project,
Wadud reportedly posted an article by MOA's Pakistan-based leader, Sheikh Mubarak Ali Gilani, on her Facebook claiming the Islamic State (ISIS/ISIL) is a puppet of the British government and a Jewish conspiracy perpetrated the attacks on Pearl Harbor and September 11, 2001 [sic] The Clarion Projectwas the first to report on the inflammatory article."
'There was no need for America to go to war against Hitler. Hitler was not the enemy of America or the American people. There was a mutual animosity between Hitler and the Jews. So, the American people paid a very heavy price for fighting someone else’s war,' Gilani wrote.
It is unconscionable that MOA — with a Judeophobic leader who reduces the Holocaust to an anti-Semitic Jewish conspiracy based on his own hatred and unrealistic fear of the Jewish people — would have the temerity to cast stones, when its own counsel and representative parrots the same toxic venom as him at the Jews.
Our group, on the other hand, does not discriminate on the basis of religion. The focus of our Ride for National Security passed Islamberg is not against Muslims. It is about Islamic terrorism, and we are against the actions of the individuals and groups who carry it out. Needless to say, not all Muslims are terrorists, and our focus would be exactly the same if Jamaat ul-Fuqra was a Nazi organization comprised of mainly Christians, Buddhists, and Jewish members, white supremacist members of the Klu Klux Klan, or, as it is in this case, Muslim members.
As Muslims concerned about Islamist terrorism, we urge the U.S. State Department to label the Pakistani militant group, Jamaat ul-Fuqra, as a Foreign Terrorist Organization. We are alarmed that this group, operating under various names like Muslims of the Americas (MOA), says it has 22 “Islamic villages” in the U.S. and Canada.
We stand in solidarity with them. If MOA has no connection to Jamaat ul-Fuqra, as it has repeatedly claimed, it has no reason whatsoever to feel harassed and discriminated against and should in fact welcome and join our May 15th ride to designate it as a foreign terrorist organization and stand in solidarity with us, The Clarion Project, and the other North American Muslim groups.
ABUAJ recognizes that the majority of Muslims are peaceful. We also understand that Muslims are by far the largest victims of not only Islamic terrorism but also of subjugation and abuse. Regardless, the risks remain the same. Today, the largest worldwide terrorist threat that we face comes from Islamic terrorism. Whether it be from many or just a few, the number is inconsequential. It is not in America’s interest to ignore and fail to raise public awareness about it, and we believe it is our human obligation to shed light on this highly serious topic, albeit often unpopular and politically incorrect.
We therefore welcome and urge American Muslims to take a stand against hate and terror and to join us in raising awareness about American safety and peace through strong homeland security. Unless the U.S. State Department reclassifies Jamaat ul-Fuqra as an international terrorist organization, the FBI is unable to act proactively and protect all Americans from the threats that it may pose to our safety.
At the time of ROCIC’s 2006 intelligence report, there were at least 35 suspected Jamaat ul-Fuqra communes, along with Islamberg, and at least a dozen members of the organization had been convicted of terrorism, including conspiracy to commit murder, firebombing, and gun smuggling. Its members also are suspected in 10 unsolved assassinations and 17 bombings that have occurred since 1980.
There is strong evidence to support that Jamaat ul-Fuqra communes in North America and Canada have been used for covert paramilitary training and activity, including the Muslim enclave of Islamberg in Hancock, New York. According to ATF Special Agent Thomas P. Gallagher’s September 28, 2001 court testimony, “Individuals from the organization [MOA] are trained in Hancock, N.Y., and if they pass the training in Hancock, N.Y., are then sent to Pakistan for training in paramilitary and survivalist training by Mr. Gilani. . . . “
This is further confirmed by raw footage, Jihad USA: Muslim Terror Training, Hancock, New York, which was obtained by The Clarion Project from a law-enforcement source and produced and released in 2009 by PRB Films and the CAN. It is believed to be from the year 2000.
As a matter a fact, Mauro of The Clarion Project recently appeared on The O’Reilly Factor and highlighted a clip from the first.
A groundbreaking 2009 documentary, Homegrown Jihad, which has been deemed as an “arch-conservative source” by The Daily Star, features an ul-Fuqra recruitment and training video from the 1980s that captures Gilani himself boasting about the success of his international organization, “Soldiers of Allah” (SOA), and its 22 U.S.-based MOA compounds. This rare footage also shows his followers on behalf of MOA training in Islamic guerrilla warfare, including tactical training in firearms, kidnapping, murder, and explosives, and its American members receiving instructions to “Act like you are a friend, and then kill him, just like from the book [the Quran].”
This sharply contrasts Mahoney’s denial when he quotes MOA’s attorney, Tahirah Clark, stating,
'[T]he assertions by the biker group that Islamberg is a training site for those aspiring to wage jihad is consistent with "the false statements that are prevalent on the internet," and claiming himself that it is in “direct contradiction of assurances from law enforcement officials that there is no known evidence of any paramilitary training taking place at Islamberg, located near Hancock.”
The same claim is made in the April 12th oped, when the unidentified author writes, “. . . we do not have to make that judgment for ourselves. Local law enforcement officials and a representative of the FBI have affirmed that there is no evidence of terrorist activity at Islamberg.” This has not always been the case.
Inasmuch as MOA has attempted to distance itself from its long history, “fighting against disinformation about its activities," we are perplexed about the nature of the disinformation to which it refers. Once again, there is strong primary-source evidence, FBI reports included, to support that Jamaat ul-Fuqra communes in North America have in fact been used for covert paramilitary training and terrorist activities.
One such substantiated case was an ul-Fuqra compound in Buena Vista, Colorado, where a 1992 raid by federal authorities uncovered a stockpile of firearms, explosive devices, forged documents, military manuals, and data on potential targets that traced back to ul-Fuqra (see here, here, here, here, here, here, and here). Authorities also uncovered a storage locker containing an array of explosives in Colorado, Springs. Footage of photographs from it and also of the Islamberg commune were recently aired in February of 2016 on Newsmax TV.
'The documented propensity for violence by this organization supports the belief the leadership of the MOA extols membership to pursue a policy of jihad or holy war against individuals or groups it considers enemies of Islam, which includes the U.S. Government. Members of the MOA are encouraged to travel to Pakistan to receive religious and military/terrorist training from Sheikh Gilani.'
The document also says that, 'The MOA is now an autonomous organization which possesses an infrastructure capable of planning and mounting terrorist campaigns overseas and within the U.S.'
Mauro adds that member activity is not confined to the Mahmoudberg compound and that “[t]he FBI documents obtained by Clarion Project clearly identify MOA as a terrorist organization. The Department of Homeland Security privately agreed in 2005, listing Jamaat ul-Fuqra (and specifically MOA) as a possible sponsor of a terrorist attack on the U.S.”
ROCIC currently reports that activity has been detected in at least 12 other locations within its jurisdiction. Law enforcement, it notes, is aware of at least the following seven U.S.-based Jamaat ul-Fuqra communes used as paramilitary-training facilities: Marion, Alabama; Commerce, Georgia; Macon, Georgia; Talihina, Oklahoma; York County, South Carolina; Dover, Tennessee; and Red House, Virginia.
Evidence also shows that there have been numerous reports of abuse by MOA members themselves (see here and here). However, unless the State Department reclassifies Jamaat ul-Fuqra as a foreign terrorist organization, the FBI’s hands are essentially tied. It is unable to freeze its funds, seize its property and assets in the U.S., stop its U.S. members from providing material support to it, deport them, and prevent other foreign members from entering our country to perpetrate terrorist attacks and other crimes in America.
Unlike The Daily Star, our information is rooted in primary-source evidence — not opinions and spin — that is based on records, reports, and raw videotaped footage from decades-long research and protracted investigations by counter-terrorist experts, the FBI, and other U.S. law enforcement agencies. Yet, stunningly, it has taken an anti-American stance against our national security to stand on the side of Islamic terrorism under the fictitious banner of standing by MOA and Islamberg but apparently not by the rest of the American people.
While proclaiming to stand against hate, The Daily Star, its writers, and friends have concocted a false narrative and taken aim against ABUAJ, portraying us as a hate group to deligitimize us and our message, stifle political discourse and action, and thwart our educational goal to raise public awareness about the genuine modern-day threat that American Muslims and non-Muslims face from homegrown Islamic terrorism. In doing so, they have stirred a cauldron of unnecessary hatred and fear. It would be all the wiser if in the future they did their due diligence before they defamed ABUAJ and other groups with baseless comparisons, libelous characterizations, and sensationalized “reports” that promote themselves and sell papers but incite anger, hatred and discord, and frighten the public — perhaps most especially the women and children who live at Islamberg in Hancock, New York.
By contrast, we stand on the side of right in support of The Clarion Project with over a dozen North American Muslim organizations who also have called on the State Department to reclassify Jamaat ul-Fuqra as a foreign terrorist organization.
We stand with the thousands of Muslims and non-Muslims, whose voices have been silenced in large part by a dishonest, complicit left-wing press that seems more intent on political correctness than it does on reporting accurate news and upholding the safety and lives of innocent Americans.
We welcome the American Muslim community to join us, stand by them too, and help us in our educational mission for the safety and security of all Americans.
UPDATE (May 13, 2016):After forwarding this press release to The Daily Star, we were contacted by its Assistant Editor to clear up "misconceptions" about our group and ride. However, we had already been in contact with a reporter, Lillian Browne, of The Reporter, who corrected the record.
Special thanks and credit to The Clarion Project and Christian Action Network for providing a wealth of resources with their groundbreaking research . . .
Hannity, Sean (Anchor). Fox News Homegrown Jihad: Why are these USA Islamic Muslim Jihadist Training Camps allowed to exist in the United States? Why are they protected by USA and State. FoxConstitutions? Roy Baron, USA Terror Camps, July 29, 2015 (rpt. from Fox News, The Hannity Show). Web Video. http://terrorcamps.com/fox-news-homegrown-jihad/
WHILE it may be impolitic to state this and that, restrictions along said PC terrain are neither here nor there at this site. In the long-term, rest assured, that’s a good thing.
THE fact of the matter is that many westerners view the continuous slaughter of Jews – wherever they may be – with a too damn bad, and who the hell cares, attitude. Even more so, when it comes to their “slicing and dicing” in Israel ala knife-jihad and other jihadi attacks, well, let’s just say the reaction is even more ho-hum, along the line: what did they do to “deserve”, to “inflame”, such murderous rage? O RLY?
AS reported countless times, the following excerpt, “Israel on Fire….” Oct. 13, 2015, is emblematic of the same:
MOST are well aware of the latest round of militant jihad waged against Israel’s Jews by an increasingly Islamist-inspired Arab Israeli population. Indeed, this is a FULL BLOWN 3rd intifada. Indubitably, they are operating in league with their “Palestinian” brothers and sisters. Yes, there is much onus to go around, and Israel’s lame-ass political leaders are hardly blameless, that’s for sure, for refusing to bring them to heel with a devastating knock-out blow.
SIGNIFICANTLY, this investigative journalist has repeatedly warned fellow Israeli Zionists of this moment in time, whereby the fifth column would OPENLY (instead of via underground support, their heretofore main modus operandi) execute jihad. This clarion call was emphasized in one global interview after another…one commentary after another. Demonstrably, the intent was to highlight the government’s abject failure to decisively deal with Israel’s internal fifth column, relative to their increasingly self-identification with Islamic jihad and concomitant mandates to kill Jews.
(In Arabic: For Palestinians, Conflict With Jews Is Existential in Nature)
Quran (8:12) – “I will cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve. Therefore strike off their heads and strike off every fingertip of them”…one of many….
MORE specifically, the following was noted last week – and it bears hammering – due to the continuous flow of Jewish blood in the streets:
AS is known, he has been an abject failure – security-wise!…..continue reading….
NOW, if this American-Israeli wasn’t such a realistic sort, it would be easy to “return the favor”, that is, flip others the bird when on the receiving end of theSAME jihad by Allah’s Muslim terrorists! Indeed, payback is a bitch. Right?
ALAS, such is not the case, unless the recipients are fellow militant Islamic jihadists, as they duke it out for hegemonic rule. Let them kill each other off….faster….faster. Yes, who the hell cares.
THAT being said, the following building blocks are where the ingrained asset of realism factors in, as the “bigger picture” is seen for what it is. Patience, dear readers.
BUILDING BLOCK ONE:
INHERENTLY, realistically speaking, when it comes to Allah’s Muslim terrorists, the fact remains that slaughtering Jews has, from time immemorial, been theirshared commitment to pagan moon-god Allah. This site gets that. But do others internalize the saying: what starts with the Jews never ends with the Jews? If not, time to catch up to speed.
In three instances (Suras 2:65, 5:60, and 7:166), the Quran tells of Allah turning Jews into apes and/or pigs….hence, their dehumanization and slaughtering!
Sura 2:65“And you had already known about those who transgressed among you concerning the sabbath, and We said to them, ‘Be apes, despised.’” Sura 7:166“So when they were insolent about that which they had been forbidden, We said to them, ‘Be apes, despised.’” Sura 5:60“Say, ‘Shall I inform you of [what is] worse than that as penalty from Allah? [It is that of] those (i.e., the Jews) whom Allah has cursed and with whom He became angry and made of them apes and pigs and slaves of Taghut. Those are worse in position and further astray from the sound way.’”
There are two differing traditions in Islam regarding what happened to the Jews who were turned into pigs. One view maintains that all pigs alive today are descendants of the Jews who were turned into pigs by Allah. The other view holds that all the Jews who were turned into pigs by Allah died out without reproducing, and therefore there is no relationship between today’s pigs and Jews:
SO as hard as it is to absorb the callous indifference of too many non-Jewish westerners (indeed, it is painfully obvious that self-hating Jews are equally callous toward their own), in regard to the continuous flow of Jewish blood in Israel, it must be done – at least for the time being. Why?
BUT even if countless prefer to continue as is, to see no Islamic evil, hear no Islamic evil, well, said immoral blindness won’t be tolerable for much longer. As a matter of fact, now that the same militant Islamic jihadists have perfected knife-jihad on Jews in Israel, their laboratory, fellow terrorists for Allah, ape-like, are wielding their sharpened weapons in America and Europe! By the by, other jihadi tactics will soon follow, thus, think – IUD’s!
One person has been killed and at least 3 injured in a knife attack by a suspected Muslim terrorist at a railway station near Munich. The suspect shouted “Allahu Akbar as he started stabbing passers-by in the town of Grafing, to the south-east of the German city, theSüddeutsche Zeitung reported.
But as we soon will hear: “It has nothing to do with Islam”
Conflicting media reports identified the attacker both as an asylum seeker and a radicalized German-born young man who converted to Islam.
The attack took place at around 4.50 am on Tuesday and the suspected perpetrator was arrested shortly afterwards. A spokesperson at the Bavarian state criminal investigation office told The Independent one of the victims was in a critical condition and died later in hospital.
Three other men were injured, one seriously. The spokesperson said she could not confirm whether the attack was terror-related or give information on any suspected motive. (Well, DUH!)
The lead investigator for the Bavarian state police, Lothar Köhler, told reporters on Tuesday afternoon that after initial questioning of the suspect, whom the authorities did not identify, officials had no “compelling evidence or plausible conclusions” as to a motive(Seriously?).
“We have no indication that he had any contact to Islamic or Salafist groups, individuals or organizations,” Mr. Köhler said. The investigator confirmed that witnesses had heard the attacker shouting “Allahu akbar” and, in German, “You infidels must die,” but as the context emerged, the attack seemed less and less likely to be motivated by extremism (No, not extremism, ISLAMIC terrorism).
NO sh-t Sherlock!
WHICH brings us that much closer to the assertion: that which starts with the Jews (in Israel and elsewhere) never ends with the Jews, as knife-jihad jumps from Israel, to America, to Europe, and up and down the west’s sphere.
INDEED, it is not for nothing that Israel has long been considered the place for law enforcement and counter-terrorism professionals to congregate for “lessons learned”, relative to “best practices” in dealing with Islamic terror.For the record, one such central gathering place is the world-renowned International Institute For Counter-Terrorism (ICT). As an aside, some of this site’s contacts are associated therein, but never mind. Incontestably, the west’s “laboratory”!!
IT is not for nothing that a convergence of ominous jihadi and Marxist forces – at the same juncture in time – are enveloping the west’s cornerstones. Both fronts are totalitarian, regardless of all else. Both despise America and Israel – and this is their main lynch pin – it is the glue which binds them together. Insoluble.
SO with Britain’s capital down for the Islamic count, Londonistan is now in the hands of Sadiq Khan. He is a smooth talking Pakistani, one whose ties to militant Islamic jihadists are rock solid. Wait and see.
BUT we are not done yet. New York City (this investigative journalist’s birthplace and previous hometown) is deeply in the mix, and its heretofore global prominence as the “go to” metropolis of America (unarguably, the west) marks its descent that much more noteworthy, relative to the west’s downward spiral.
(Sarsour, a radical Muslim activist useful idiot for Mayor Bill de Blasio, blasted into the mainstream in August with a fawning profilepublished in The New York Times headlined: “Linda Sarsour is a Brooklyn Homegirl in a Hijab.” OMG…is it any wonder that HUSSEIN Obama’s “Shariah House” dubbed her a “Champion of Change”? Yes, it is very clear – on multiple levels – that NYC’s jacked-up Islamist-inclined Mayor is in league with HUSSEIN Obama.)
MOVING right along, let’s segue to the main thrusts, that which are germane to Obama Inc.’s assists to the slave and sex trade industries. Know that America’s nightmarish descent is tied-into Londonistan (other Euro capitals too) becoming an Islamic outpost. Both are part and parcel of the same cultural suicide plaguing the west.
THUS, even as this is being reported, illegals unceasingly flow across U.S. borders, and many are minors. In tandem, some have criminal backgrounds, rife with graduated levels of seriousness. Still yet, HUSSEIN Obama’s Mafia-like DHShas been ordered to “stand down.” So the question which has been hovering overhead, at least for those with inquiring minds, has been: where exactly are these minors headed, and to whom are they entrusted?
A fair enough question, right? So it would seem….
BUT before we delve into this illegal and morally bankrupt terrain, let it be known: this is the same reprehensible administration which supports slave “reparations” for absolutely no justifiable reason, other than to keep race relations at a ratcheted up boiling point, ala the non-stop entitlement gravy train, as it chugs along. Mendaciously, they have yet to admit that slavery is thriving in Islamic dominated nations, and sexual/slave jihad is fatwa-drivenby its Shariah Law enforcers. Don’t forget this.
One of the nation’s top investigative journalists has discovered an untold number of illegal immigrant children crossing the border are walking straight into a living nightmare of degradation and depravity, thanks to the chaos at the southern border and the U.S. government looking the other way.
Five-time Emmy Award winner and Edward R. Murrow award recipient Sharyl Attkisson revealed to WND, “Most people have no idea that thousands of juvenile illegal immigrants are surging across the border.
“And more importantly, perhaps, that we’re spending a billion tax dollars a year caring for them, only to turn over an undetermined number of them into the hands of criminals who are little more than slave traders, sexual abusers and even convicted killers.”
Children put into the hands of slavers, molesters and murderers? Who could allow such a thing? The U.S. government.
REST assured, the same multicultural and anti-western rot which is threatening to bring down America is wrecking havoc all over Europe. To wit, the election of a Pakistani “terror-tied” Mayor of London – who defended the 9/11/01 militant jihadists – must be viewed as Exhibit Number One. Indeed, it should have been wholly expected. How couldn’t it be?
In 2005 and 2006 he visited terror-charged Babar Ahmad in Woodhill Prison. Mr. Ahmed was extradited to the U.S. in 2012, serving time in prison before being returned to the UK in 2015. Mr. Ahmed pleaded guilty to the terrorist offences of conspiracy and providing material support to the Taliban.
And Mr. Khan also campaigned for the release and repatriation of Shaker Aamer, Britain’s last Guantanamo detainee, who was returned to the UK in November.
Both Messrs Aamer and Ahmed provided Mr. Khan with links to the advocacy group CAGE, which described the Islamic State executioner Mohammed Emwazi as a “beautiful young man” and which has campaigned on behalf of both men. Mr. Khan is reported to have shared a stage with five Islamic extremists, including at sex-segregated events. Even so, his poll numbers remained firm until election day.
A letterto the Guardian in the wake of the 7/7 terrorist bombings on London,blaming terrorism on British government policy;
His legaldefence of Zacarias Moussaoui, a 9/11 terrorist who confessed to being a member of Al Qaeda;
His chapter in a book, entitled “Actions Against the Police,” which advises on how to bring charges against the police for “racism.” This is the same police force that Mr. Khan as London mayor would exercise authority over;
His defence of Islamist extremist Azzam Tamimi. When Dr. Tamimi told a crowd that the publication of cartoons of the Prophet Muhammed would “cause the world to tremble” and predicted “Fire… throughout the world if they don’t stop,” Mr. Khan, who shared a platform with him, dismissed the threats as “flowery language.”
His platform-sharing with Suliman Gani, a south London imam who has urged female subservience to men and called for the founding of an Islamic state.
Londoners got news on Friday that their mayor for the next four years is a man with the judgement, priorities, and fellow travellers as laid out above. This, combined with an annual £16bn budget and an army of police, bureaucrats, and officials, would make Mr. Khan one of the most powerful Muslims in the Western world.
MORE specifically, the following sets the western axis on its head, as it catapults into the abyss:
The Labour Party (The UK Version of Democrats) is bubbling with excitement over their new “diversity” they have now brought to the most powerful city in the world. The rest of the UK either does not care or is watching with great unease, and by the rest of the UK, I mean the true native- the English, Scottish, Welsh, Irish, and all the sub-ethnicities. Because their nation is being taken away from them, right before their eyes.
Now this situation did not happen in a vacuum. The British Isles but in particular, England, has been on the decline since the Protestant reformation. If you don’t believe me, I suggest you read William Cobbett’s A History of the Protestant Reformation in England and Ireland. A Protestant himself, he concludes that the Reformation violently aborted and destroyed the Medieval system in England, which (and contrary to the myths that we are so often told) provided for a stable society, a more balanced economy, and a religion and culture which bound the people together. For a long time, England was, well,English. It was following the English state’s destruction of the Church that the society began to fall apart, and the plethora of evils which came to characterize English society in the following centuries…..
The UK did conquer the world – for a time politically and militarily, and still remains in charge financially- but it lost its soul…..
The fact is that the election of a Muslim mayor of London is in the Muslim minds a confirmation and in the minds of wise Englishmen a warning- Islam is taking over the UK. Indeed, one day the UK will wake up with Muslims in charge and on that day, whenever it comes, there is going to be a sudden change, as always takes place in society. Nothing happens gradually, but rather the buildup is always gradual and the inevitable results of said buildup an exponential event.
What is the vision I see? With a Muslim mayor of London and Muslims in greater positions of power, one day in the not too distant future they are going to turn on the English like a pit bull on its master. When that happens, the English will be given two, possibly three choices from the Muslims- convert to Islam, be put to death or into chattel as a slave, and if they are lucky, go into exile in a foreign nation.
CONSEQUENTIALLY, the fall of the British Empire is a signal event and clarion call, a shout out: every European capital will land (give it a decade) in the hands of Allah’s Muslim terrorists, albeit, couched under multicultural rhetoric, that is, until they are firmly ensconced to Islamize the entire continent! And those who pooh poohed the Casandra-like calls from this site – relative to America and Europe sharing intertwining fates, particularly, after a March 2014 commentary blared, “America on the precipice: Eurabia’s fate sealed with British Court’s acceptance of Shariah Law” – couldn’t have been more wrong. Bat Ye’or andOriana Fallaci are tarred as overwrought hysterics, “racists”, and worse. Well, the twilight years of Europe’s rancid multiculturalism is now upon all the leftist hissers and brayers alike. Yes, the boot and sword of Islam is not far behind!!
IN the main, most non-Muslim westerners understand that it is “likely”…”somewhat”….incompatible with the west. Even fewer have a clue as to its Koranic basis and its lack of boundaries – literally. True, Islam’s “vague” mistreatment of women is in the forefront of any discussion, however, that too is often misunderstood, even romanticized, if you dare imagine. Lawrence of Arabia fever-like.
PAR for the course, countless westerners are lulled into believing that whatever “norms” are Shariah bound – and culturally endemic within the horrific world of Islam – are confined to its followers and borders, therefore, it is none of their business. Newsflash One: said delusional thinking is way off target. Deadly.
AS reported on Oct. 23, 2014, the newly minted “most influential” American-Muslim came into this investigative journalist’s radar, a full 4 months before he was anointed TOP Islamic dog! For the record, his supporters were none too pleased with the spotlight at this site. Oh well.
WHICH brings this discussion full circle to the aforementioned “back-story”, one that hits an absolute bulls-eye. In a nutshell, it targets a two-tier danger that awaits westerners, when in close proximity to Shariah. Moreover, those who, for whatever reason, find themselves in Islam’s cross hairs – expecting their own leaders to push back against Islam’s boot – will be sorely misled. Indeed, they are placing themselves in very grave straits. Stranded. Newsflash Two: their submissive western leaders will NOT stand up for them. Period.
MIND you, even though the following barbarism took place in 2008, its intrinsic value, lesson learned, stands as Exhibit Number One:
An Australian woman is suing a five-star UAE hotel after she was drugged and raped by co-workers – but ended up in jail for eight months for having sex outside marriage.
Alicia Gali, 29, had her drink spiked and was raped by four co-workers at the luxury Le Meridien Al Aqah Beach Resort in the United Arab Emirates in June 2008.
She is seeking compensation from her former employer for breaching its workplace duty of care after she reported the assault to authorities, only to be jailed for eight months on an adultery charge.
Ms Gali spent eight months in prison as it is illegal as having sex outside marriage in the UAE is illegal.
Australian embassy staff advised Ms Gali and her family not to go to the media during her time in custody, when she was locked in a cell with 30 other women.
She has since been pardoned and was released in March 2009.
AND if westerners are wondering if the legal system in Australiais emblematic of the cowing and bowing to Islam, when Allah’s Muslim Terrorists strike within their own borders, well, the following cautionary lesson serves as Exhibit Number Two:
Bit by bit, Western nations are adopting Muslim legal standards on blasphemy and on the treatment of women.
The excuses are manifold. Racism, cultural differences, Islamophobia, relativism… but it all ends the same way, with Western writers, artists and thinkers being censored and Western women being subject to Taliban treatment.
An Afghan refugee would drive from his home in Tullamarine to nightclubs in Frankston late at night searching for drunk, vulnerable young woman to prey on, a court was told today.
He would pick them up in his white 1988 Honda Civic and rape them.
The victim was sitting on the footpath behind the 21st Century Dance Club when Esmatullah Sharifi approached her and offered to give her a lift to the Bay Hotel.
She accepted but became anxious and confused when they had been driving for an hour and she saw a road sign saying Sorrento.
Sharifi then pulled over into a dark side street and raped her in the front passenger seat.
“She began to scream and cry out for help,” Ms Dalziel said.
“The accused put his left hand over her mouth and his right hand around her neck, restricting her breathing. He said to her, ‘I’ll take you home after it, I’ll give you back your phone as well’.
In the rapist’s defense, his lawyer argued that he wasn’t at all clear about this whole “Women are human beings” thing.
Mr Regan said Esmatullah Sharifi was uneducated, illiterate, inexperienced in forming relationships with women, and was confused about the nature of consent. He is in Australia on a permanent protected visa.
The judge didn’t buy it then, but the usual lefty approach is to just keep appealing until you find a bleeding heart judge who accepts the horrible notion being put forward. And that didn’t take very long.
Granting leave to appeal, Court of Appeal Justice Robert Redlich said: “The sentencing judge rejected any suggestion (Esmatullah Sharifi) didn’t have a clear concept of consent in sexual relations.”
In April last year, a psychologist told the County Court that Sharifi had “an unclear concept of what constitutes consent in sexual relationships” in Australia.
“It proves, in my view, an adequate basis for most grounds of appeal that (Sharifi) wishes to pursue,” the judge said.
We’re not just dealing with ignorance of the law. We have Western judges setting out the notion that if a Muslim settler in Europe, America or Australia does not understand the concept that women can refuse sexual contact, that this is a mitigating circumstance.
Ms Dalziel said Esmatullah Sharifi claimed he did not have a great understanding of sexual mores in Australia but Judge Mark Dean disagreed.
“These are acts of violence,” the judge said. “Serious acts of violence against women, nothing to do with sexual mores. They’re brutal acts of violence.”
But they do. In Muslim sexual mores, serious acts of violence being committed against women are not a problem because the women do not belong to themselves. They belong to their family.
Islam does not recognize the same concept of individual rights as civilized jurisprudence does. Furthermore Muslims from tribal societies like Afghanistan bring those same tribal attitudes along.
If Afghan men have a culture which leaves them more likely to rape, and our courts have a culture of being more lenient as a consequence, I suggest Australian women have an interest in stopping the boats until we get this sorted out:
And that doesn’t just go only for Australia. Stop the boats. Stop the planes. Stop the trains.
The left cannot have it both ways.
Either Esmatullah Sharifi is responsible for his own actions. Or he isn’t. Either rape is cultural or it’s individual. Either Esmatullah Sharifi should be hit with the full force of the law or the Afghan culture of rape represents a threat to non-Muslim countries.
BUT most significantly for Americans (westerners alike), they must consider the facts at hand on multiple levels, that is, if they value their own safety.
POINTEDLY, if one travels (male or female), let alone resides in an Islamic country, one can easily get caught up in a Shariah underpinned nightmare. Not only that, a westerner’s citizenship means less than squat, when it comes to escaping their brand of “justice.” Internalize this truth too: not one country, let alone America, will protest or protect from Islam’s boot.
RESULTANT, westerners must come to grips that they are on their own, when it comes to beating back Shariah Law. This is the case whether they are outside their own borders or even inside them. The good news is that it can be stopped, blow by blow.
AND for the record, up until 9/11/01 – or thereabouts – one could have been forgiven for being ignorant of the most brutal aspects of Islam via Shariah Law. No longer. After all, alternative media – with this site in the forefront– has been beating the drum at a steady pace. And if one is computer literate, it is next to impossible to veer away. In fact, their barbarism has been catapulting across the globe – in one way or another – and is sanctioned by Shariah Law. How much more obvious does it have to be?
WHILE the civilized world – or what’s left of it – stands behind “remembering” the MASSIVE slaughter of six million Jews via speeches, monuments, and educational programs, the fact remains that ensuring the safety of a people who “rose from the ashes” – present and future generations – is barely on their agendas. In a nutshell, Jews are viewed as “obstacles to peace”, as thorns in the side of those they desperately want to placate – a billion plus Muslims!
BUT never mind all that. If anything, the only lessons worth learning are ones which EMPOWER the Jewish people, regardless of everything and everyone else. And if that means butting up against self-proclaimed elitists and laying to waste as many militant Islamic jihadists and their enablers as necessary, all the better. So be it.
EVEN so, for a clear-eyed assessment to the real meaning of HOLOCAUST REMEMBRANCE DAY, look no further.
During the seven year reign of the nightmare President allegedly named Barack Hussein Obama, I have written several political columns and quite a few op-eds for one of the few major news websites that didn’t shill for Obama. I did my best to inform the voters they were supporting a man who hates America and loathes the Jewish people and Israel. I warned Americans about Obama’s ties with Islamic extremists who support the destruction of Israel and with the racist Nation of Islam, and disclosed his behind closed doors speeches slandering Israel and supporting a 23rd Arab nation that would completely replace Israel and take every inch of the land of the world’s only Jewish homeland.
The mainstream media abandoned their obligations to investigate and fully vet anyone running for president and became the propaganda wing of the Obama campaign, and later, the Obama Administration.
Even then, I went on the record to say that before he was done with his destructive agenda, he would betray Israel in the United Nations and vote yes or abstain on a Security Council resolution to unilaterally establish the state of Palestine without a peace treaty between Israel and the Palestinians, while declaring Israel’s borders to be based on the 1948 armistice lines, and giving half of Jerusalem, including the 3200 year old Jewish Old City and the Western Wall of the Holy Temple of the Jewish people, to Palestinians for their capital. Israel would be only eight kilometers wide at its narrowest, and the holy city of the Jewish people would once again be divided. The Palestinians have already published their plans to demolish the Western Wall and the Jewish Old City, and replace all the Jewish Holy sites with apartments and stores. An official PA video announcing this plan is even available online.
Under the rules of the UN, a vote to establish Palestine in the Security Council is binding on UN member nations, unlike a General Assembly vote, which is only a recommendation, not law. When Israel refuses to remove more than a million Jewish Israelis from their homes in Judea and Samaria, ordering them to live inside the 1948 “Auschwitz” boundaries and turn half of Jerusalem over to the Palestinian state, the Jewish nation would be denounced as a rogue, criminal state.
While Israel would forcefully declare the UN was in violation of the UN Charter, and the Palestinians were in violation of the Oslo Accords, and the Jewish state would refuse to obey one word of the Security Council resolution, Israel would then be expelled from the UN and subjected to complete isolation. The UN would use the dozens of resolutions that condemn only Israel, while ignoring the hideous crimes against humanity by a vast majority of the UN’s members.The UN would declare a blockade of Israel’s coastline and ports, establish a shoot to kill and no-fly zone over Israel, ban all trade with Israel, seize Israeli property and assets anywhere they could be found outside of Israel, forbid any financial transactions with the Jewish state, forbid any and all investment by Israel or in Israel by other nations. There would a complete ban on cultural exchanges with Israeli institutions, international education programs and institutions would expel every single Israeli Jew, scientific research with Israel would end, and the UN would cut off all military aid and supplies to the Jewish state. Even the USA, Israel’s only real ally for the last 68 years, would follow every one of the sanctions.
Israel would soon be unable to defend herself from the 300 Million Muslims who surround her, and 6.5 million Israeli Jews would be slowly starved to death if they were not slaughtered first by Jihadi terrorists,and the military forces of 23 Arab nations with unlimited arms shipments from Iran. Personally, I believe that within minutes of Israel being sanctioned by the UN and expelled, ISIS, Hamas, Fatah, The PLO, Islamic Jihad, Hezbollah, and even the Iranian Revolutionary Guard would launch an all out attack against Israel.
The last weapon of the UN against Israel is another Security Council resolution to send UN troops to force Israel to comply, including US military forces wearing UN uniforms and using all the latest American weapons. I have no doubt that Obama would welcome the opportunity to join the UN military coalition against Israel.
Now, there are many folks who are inclined to call anyone who writes the words I just typed a lunatic, but for the last six months, Obama has repeatedly threatened to abandon 68 years of US policy and the alliance with Israel, and for the first time ever, America may vote in favor of a Security Council resolution that establishes a Palestinian state without successful peace negotiations between Israel and the Arabs.
Just yesterday, an insistent journalist got into a heated back and forth with a State Department spokesperson, who, when asked if Obama would continue to follow long standing US policy to veto any Security Council resolution that unilaterally established a Palestinian state, refused to make any promise to protect Israel, and said that all cards were on the table if Israel continues to refuse to negotiate a treaty with the Palestinians.
I won’t bother to go into a lengthy rebuttal of the last seven years of Obama’s non-stop statements blaming everything on Israel because Obama’s every word against Israel is a LIE. The Arabs and the 56 Islamic nations want Israel wiped off the map, and all 6.5 million Israeli Jews dead or stateless, doomed to wander the earth without a nation of their own. The Jews would once again be the only previously existing nations in the history of nations to be denied the right of a homeland and self-determination as they were from 72 CE until 1948.
In 2007, Obama said he supported Jerusalem as the undivided, eternal capital of Israel and the Jewish people. When he spit those words from his lips, I said he was lying to our faces, and I called him a Jew-hater and an enemy of the nation of Israel. He has proven me correct, and he is one step away from ordering Samantha Powers to vote yes to a UN Security Council resolution that will lead to an all-out war in the Middle East, and perhaps, World War Three.
I wonder how many of the people who read this are aware that only the US and Russia have more nukes than Israel. China doesn’t, Britain doesn’t, and France does not have more nukes than the Jewish state. Israel is the world’s number three nuclear power. I would suggest that anyone who is either influenced by Jew-hate or delusional enough to think the IDF and the IAF or the Israeli government or the 6.5 million Israel Jews and those of us around the world who are from Israel or support Israel are going to cower in fear and beg the UN for mercy.
When the Nazis tried to exterminate every Jew on earth and killed six million of my people, the rest of the world did nothing to help the Jews of Europe. Britain refused to allow Jews to enter England or the Middle East and the US refused to offer the Jewish people even temporary safe haven.
We will never know how many lives might have been saved if the British and the American leaders could have set aside humanity’s 2000 year-long epidemic of Jew-hate to provide shelter to the Jews of Europe; even if it was only until the end of the war. Would the population of Israeli Jews still be 6.5 million in 2016 or would there be eight or ten million Jews living in Israel?
Two thirds of all the Jews living in Europe died during the Shoah, yet we were not exterminated. We rose again from the ashes to build one of the most successful and powerful nations on earth. The nation of Israel, reestablished on our ancestral lands, was renewed as the homeland of the Jewish people. After 2000 years of genocidal violence waged against the Jews just for being Jews, the Jewish people finally had a country again.
The world loves to build memorials to dead Jews, but the seven billion non-Jews of the human race have little use for us when we are live Jews. But the dynamic has changed. For the first time since the days of King David and his son, Solomon, the Jewish people are strong and we are finally able to defend ourselves, our loved ones, and our nation. We await the day the Lord’s promise to his people, Israel, is fulfilled.
“Therefore this is what the Sovereign Lord says: I will now restore the fortunes of Jacob[d] and will have compassion on all the people of Israel, and I will be zealous for my holy name.26 They will forget their shame and all the unfaithfulness they showed toward me when they lived in safety in their land with no one to make them afraid.27 When I have brought them back from the nations and have gathered them from the countries of their enemies, I will be proved holy through them in the sight of many nations.28 Then they will know that I am the Lord their God, for though I sent them into exile among the nations, I will gather them to their own land, not leaving any behind.29 I will no longer hide my face from them, for I will pour out my Spirit on the people of Israel, declares the Sovereign Lord.”
“And you shall know that I am in the middle of Israel, and that I am the LORD your God, and none else: and my people shall never be ashamed.”
שְׁמַע יִשְׂרָאֵל יהוה אֱלֹהֵינוּ יהוה אֶחָד
AM YISRAEL CHAI !!
BOTTOM LINE: if it means that every Holocaust Memorial has to be sacrificed, burnt to the ground, paradoxically, to prove that NEVER AGAIN really has teeth, well, so be it.
LET’S cut to the chase: far too many power brokers mouth platitudes about the need “to remember”, behaving as if pithy slogans and erecting new memorials is gonna cut it. As if it is their coinage to bear, just as long as the Jews are kept in line.
THIS investigative journalist is (literally) in the cross hairs of the Muslim Brotherhood Mafiaand it is not for nothing. Featuring, shining a spotlight on, their global goals in a major interview (Oct. 2013) elicited one threat after another. Not only that, an upcoming book release (Sept. 2016) will enrage them even further – and that’s all for the good! Effectively, if patriots (no less, American-Israeli citizens who suffer under the boot of militant Islamic jihad in both countries) don’t stand up to them, strong and proud, then who will? Indeed.
SO it is under this rubric that a compendium of this site’s work, invariably, oftenhighlights the danger elicited from stealth jihad. As stated, frontal jihad hardly necessitates any edification, after all, its bloody “handiwork” is self-evident!
AND while stealth jihad encompasses many insidious forms (primarily, via silencing /omertas ala CAIR, the insertion of Islamic dictates into institutional and educational venues, and the like… ) know that its end point is the same: America, as a Shariah Law compliantnation! Resultant, the rest of the west will follow and fall into submissive line.
THUS, let us recap a MAJOR stealth arena – so that we can then step into its pernicious and concomitant duping of non-Muslim Americans and westerners at large – restaurant-wise via Sharia Law mandated halal, that which absolutely aids and abets the funding of militant Islamic jihad ala zakat!
AS anticipated, each time Islamic barbarism is revealed for what it is – be it toward humans or animals – the silence is deafening from those who claim to be liberals, the self-proclaimed protectors of human and animal rights. And not to be a nitpicker, but isn’t it overtly revealing that even the MEGA slaughter of Christians and Jewsfails to ignite their outrage and cries for actionable justice? W T F is going on here??
SO what does this all amount to, other than the much needed disinfectant to expose the left’s damnable hypocrisy and worse? Well, it should serve as clear and convincing notice to all patriots who care about the Constitution and want to preserve and protect its basis from a full-on infiltration and penetration of Shariah Law!Know that time is NOT on America’s side.
MOST significantly, and not to be lost in the discussion, Halal on steroids – Eid’s glorified slaughter-fest as its most high profile exhibit, akin to all aspects of Shariah compliance – is inextricably tied into funding terrorism, all the apologists and their howls notwithstanding.
Islamic law requires a 2.5% tax called zakat which is imposed on income and accumulated wealth of all devout Muslims.
ie. the muslims that are involved in the halal industry – the imams, slaughtermen, workers, business & shop owners etc.
Halal certification is done on a fee for service basis, with the fees varying with the scope and scale of the services.
Certification is provided by Islamic organizations, and would not be halal if the required zakat was not paid on the fees.
What you may not know is that there are eight classes of zakat recipients, each of which gets a 1/8 share of the gross.
One of those classifications is fighters in Allah’s cause aka Mudihideen, aka terrorists.
When you purchase a product which is certified Halal, you are indirectly contributing to terrorism.
I quote from Reliance of the Traveller, the Shari’ah handbook of the majority Sunni sect of Islam.
h8.7: The Eight Categories of Recipients
It is obligatory to distribute one’s zakat among eight categories of recipients (O: meaning that zakat goes to none besides them), one-eighth of the zakat to each category. (n: In the Hanafi school, it is valid for the giver to distribute his zakat to all of the categories, some of them, or to confine himself to just one of them (al-Lubab fi sharh al-Kitab(y88), 1.155). )
h8.17: Those Fighting for Allah
The seventh category is those fighting for Allah, meaning people engaged in Islamic military operations for whom no salary has been allotted in the army roster, but who are volunteers for jihad without remuneration.
They are given enough to suffice them for the operation, even if affluent; of weapons, mounts, clothing, and expenses for the duration of the journey, round trip, and the time they spend there, even if prolonged.
Though nothing has been mentioned here of the expense involved in supporting such people’s families during this period, it seems clear that they should also be given it.
Over a billion people in the world follow the teaching of the Prophet Muhammad. His followers accept the validity of the prophethood of Muhammad and sincerely believe that his teachings are a divine message from Allah (God).
They believe that the message is embodied in the Holy Qur’an, and this Qur’an is the living word of Allah for ALL of humanity.
Islamic Charity Organizations: Alms & Terrorism
As-Sadaqât (here it means Zakât) are only for the Fuqarâ’ (poor), and Al-Masâkin (the poor) and those employed to collect (the funds); and for to attract the hearts of those who have been inclined (towards Islâm); and to free the captives; and for those in debt; and for Allâh’s Cause (i.e. for Mujâhidûn – those fighting in the holy wars), and for the wayfarer (a traveller who is cut off from everything); a duty imposed by Allâh. And Allâh is All-Knower, All-Wise. Al-Tawba 9:60
If your restaurant is serving you ‘Creekstone Farms’ Beef, you are eating meat that has been inhumanely slaughtered by Muslim halal butchers. If it’s not indicated on the menu, be sure to ask the waiter or manager if their beef is from Creekstone. If it is, what you do next is up to you.
What if I told you that the high-quality beef served top restaurants across America was actually Halal? Impossible, right? Well, guess what? It’s actually true. Creekstone Farms, one of the top choices of beef for restaurants across America, just so happens to be a fully Halal beef processing company. As in ZABIHAHHalal.
That means you can walk into any restaurant that serves items with Creekstone Farms beef, and know that the animal from which your tasty steak came from was forced to suffer agonizing pain while he slowly bled out because Muslims think this makes the meat taste better.
According to Rich Swearingen, head of international sales for Creekstone, the company has already received backlash from people in the Kansas area who are outraged by halal slaughter for posting the job ad to hire Muslim employees.
But this didn’t stop Creekstone from keeping Halal. They continued their Halal certification through the Halal Transactions of Omaha despite the Islamophobic backlash and still only hire Muslim slaughtermen. In a way, they fought against it during a time when xenophobes go as far as document meat suppliers that go Halal on their blogs.
There are probably people who so are against Halal meat but end up eating Creekstone beef at a high end restaurant only they have no idea it’s actually Halal,” Rich laughed.
So, what would drive a company like Creekstone to convert to a fully Halal process? According to to Rich Swearingen, head of international sales for Creekstone that Dr. Alabsy routed me to, the answer lies in the Middle East.
Apparently, within the past decade or so, the company decided to expand their business to the Middle East by getting into the meat export business. Restaurants in rich Gulf countries like the UAE or metropolitan cities like Cairo would probably pay top dollar for high quality fatty juicy American Angus beef which is in abundance over the leaner, scarcer local grass-fed stuff. Dr. Alabsy proposed the idea himself, the company went for it, and the rest is, as they say, history.
How I Found Out: A good friend of mine sent me an email with a list of high-end restaurants in downtown Chicago that serve dishes made with Creekstone Farms beef with the words, “LET’S GO!”
I was confused. I knew her and her family only eat Halal meat so why was she linking me to restaurants with meat from that company. But that’s when the thought came to mind. “Is Creekstone Halal?” I wondered.
A quick Google search for “Creekstone + Halal” found me at Creekstone’s website which states that their premium Angus beef is Halal certified through the Halal Transactions of Omaha.
Apparently, this is known for those familiar with Creekstone. In fact, my friend found out from another mutual friend who follows the scholarly opinion that conventional meat in America is Halal. While he was dining at one of the top steak restaurants in New York, Minetta Tavern, he met with the head chef at the time, Nasr Ahmed, a Muslim. Chef Nasr informed him the steaks and burgers he had been eating that he thought were from cattle conventionally slaughtered were actually made from barbarically-slaughtered Halal beef.
That means all of those high-end restaurants from the Chicago list sent to me also had beef dishes that were made with Halal meat. And the same goes for cities all across the country that carry Creekstone. The crazy thing about this? Creekstone Farms’ is considered some of the best beef in America. It’s not standard stuff that gets sourced to fast food joints.
It is extremely high quality beef. According to Creekstone’s website, they produce all Angus beef. The cattle are all-American from the Midwest. No antibiotics or hormones, so effectively the same as organic. According to other sources online, the cattle are given a special proprietary feed to make them extra fatty and flavorful unlike any other cattle in the nation.
(And they are slaughtered unlike any other cattle in the nation. They have their throats cut while they are fully conscious but the spinal cord is left in tact (cutting the spinal cord eliminates all pain for the animal. The animals writhe in agony while they bleed out which can take up to 5 minutes or more. The screaming and moaning sounds coming from the animals are too much for anyone but Muslims to bear)
Its touted by top food authorities: The New York Times wrote a huge article praising Creekstone Farms beef. Pat LaFreida, the famous meat purveyor of New York, sources a lot of Creekston.
The name is such a big deal it’s printed on menus. Top steakhouses order Creekstone Farms’ beef for their menus. In fact, many of them even list the name “Creekstone” next to their respective dishes, as in “24 oz. dry aged Creekstone Farms ribeye steak,” because it’s a big deal.
I began by reaching out to Creekstone Farms themselves, asking if they indeed do perform Halal slaughter. I also wanted to know if all of their beef is processed Halal or just a portion of it. I assumed, at first, that they must have a Halal program that slaughters just a portion of their beef according to Islamic law.
Turns out that not only was Creekstone able to confirm that they perform Halal slaughter, their entire operation was actually Halal.
“All Creekstone Farms cattle are processed in a manner that meets the religious qualifications of Halal,” Courtney Every, Marketing Coordinator for Creekstone Farms, responded via email. “However, we only certify it as Halal if it is requested by the customer.”
So every one of the cattle at Creekstone Farms was being slaughtered in a Halal manner. But not every supplier ordering from the company would know that since they were ordering the beef because of its quality, not its Halal status. This means that there are probably a ton of restaurants all over America with Halal meat and they don’t even know it.
Directly contacting the Halal certifier, Halal Transactions of Omaha, was the only way to know exactly how the cattle at Creekstone are slaughtered.
“We do certify the Halal beef of Creekstone Farms and all their beef is hand slaughtered,” wrote Dr. Ahmad Alabsy, director of HTO, in an email. “All the beef that we certify is hand slaughtered by trained Muslim slaughtermen. The Muslim slaughterman pronounces the Tasmiah, Bismillah Allahu Akbar, and the knife is used by hand to perform the slaughtering of animals.”
Holy cow. So the beef at Creekstone is slaughtered in a fully Halal manner: hand slaughtered (zabihah), by a Muslim, in God’s name.
You can also check here for a comprehensive list of stores and restaurants that sell halal products to see if a store or restaurant in your area is making you pay for Halal-certification: ZABIHAH
ALAS, for those who are more inclined to say, so what, who the hell cares which way the animal is slaughtered as long as it is tasty, well, the next time an Islamic terror attack explodes in America – rest assured, there will be an uptick in the near future – just internalize that each and every attack is funded – in one way or another – by the monies collected via zakat, of which halal slaughter is a BIG funder!
MOST significantly, that makes said indifference more in line with being an absolute ENABLER to Islamic jihad. Yes, if one knows what’s at stake….steak…. yet, and chooses to ignore its knock-on ramifications, what else is left to say?
IN this regard, clearly, America is on the precipice. Thus, it should stand to reason that ever more stringent measures should be instituted from the Defense Department, as opposed to loosening them, that is, if saving America is their top priority. Not only that, the fact that said re-calibrating is F/B/O of citizens whose political, cultural and religious ideology is the source of the gravest threat to America, well, is proof positive of what is taking place: the purposeful Islamization of America through the military’s apparatus, and up and down Washington’s chain of command!
NOW, this site has already proven that the nation’s domestic security arms – under HUSSEIN Obama’s overhaul – are in the tank for Islam. Let’s accept thisclear-eyed assessment as a given. After all, there is no sense in reworking the wheel, nor is there any time to do so.
STILL yet, it is intrinsic to alert patriots to Senator Jon L. Kyl’s ominous warning (back in 2003) under his Chairmanship of the Senate’s Judiciary Committee’s Subcommittee on Terrorism, Technology, and Homeland Security. Mind you, its basis has risen exponentially under the Islamist-in-Chief’s two-term reign of terror:
“There have been an increasing number of instances in which Wahhabists have successfully penetrated key U.S. institutions, such as the military and [the religious programs of] our prison system.”
YOU got that?
MOVING right along, Islam’s penetration under FBI Director Robert Mueller – having served from Sept. 2001 – Sept. 2013 – has exerted an unmitigated disaster. Indeed, his tarnished reign spanned under Wahhabi inclined George Bush, but accelerated under HUSSEIN Obama. Is it any wonder that America is in the tank for Islam?? Again, the proofs are manifest.
MORE specifically, limp-wristed Mueller had 12 years to genuflect to Islam – and he did! Consider the following as a foretaste:
“After the 9/11/01 attacks, FBI Director Mueller assured Americans that the nineteen al-Qaida hijackers operated alone when they lived here, that they were relatively isolated and got no help or support from the Muslim community. According to him, 9/11 was just the reult of a few bad apples.
Only he was not leveling with the American people.
In fact, the Joint Inquiry into 9/11 by Congress found that a number of Muslims provided the hijackers with “substantial” assistance……
If Director Mueller and other PC-addled bureaucrats and politicians in Washington do not understand the enemy, many of the field agents working terrorist leads in Chicago, New York, Detroit, San Diego, Minneapolis, and Phoenix understand too well. They know firsthand that there is a network of terrorists, facilitators, and pro-terrorist Muslim organizationsopreating within the U.S. largely under the radar. Yet there is still reluctance in Washington to let agents knock on door for fear of offending religious and ethnic minorties- and triggering a CAIR media fatwa….”
-INFILTRATION, HOW MUSLIM SPIES AND SUBVERSIVES HAVE PENETRATED WASHINGTON – PAUL SPERRY (2005)
CLEAR as bell. That was then….even more so now.
WHICH brings us to today’s core; the Islamization of U.S. Armed Forces, its acceleration, knock on effects, and proofs thereof.
READERS may – or may not – know that under HUSSEIN Obama’s “guiding” hands (during 2012) the Pentagon was ordered to institute Islamic “sensitivity” training for the troops. Hmm…and a F U salute too to the dhimmified Gen and the rest of the prostrating gang!
Afghan security forces, our supposed allies, are slaughtering American troops. Thirty-three soldiers have been killed by “green on blue” attacks this year alone. The situation is so bad that the training of Afghan forces has been temporarily suspended.
How has the Pentagon responded?
By blaming our troops.
Top officials believe culturally offensive behavior is the motivation behind the killings, so it’s stepped up Islamic sensitivity training for our troops.
If you don’t want to be shot in the back by your Afghan training partners, the Pentagon advises, don’t offend their religious sensibilities. Don’t kick your feet up on a table, for instance, and never ask to see a picture of their wives and kids. “There’s a percentage [of attacks] which are cultural affronts,” Joint Chiefs Chairman Gen. Martin Dempsey said in a recent interview.…
In the past three years, uniformed Afghans have murdered at least 97 US and NATO troops.…
Some 120,000 American and other foreign troops mix closely with 350,000 Afghan security forces. Afghan trainees and guards are co-located on US bases, where they share bathrooms, gyms and mess halls.
To avoid offending them, US commanders are putting troops through intense Muslim sensitivity training. Among other things, they’ve been ordered to:
* Wear surgical gloves whenever handling a copy of the Koran.
* Never walk in front of a praying Muslim.
* Never show the bottom of boots while sitting or lying across from a Muslim, which in Islam is considered an insult.
* Never share photos of wives or daughters.
* Never smoke or eat in front of Muslims during the month long Ramadan fasting.
* Avoid winking, cursing or nose-blowing in the presence of Muslims — all viewed as insults in Islam.
* Avoid exiting the shower without a towel.
* Avoid offering and accepting things with the left hand, which in Islam is reserved for bodily hygiene and considered unclean.
Troops who violate the sensitivity rules face severe punishment.
Military officials who have done tours in Afghanistan are outraged that brass would even suggest US troops are partly to blame for their own murders.
“I would like to see a public affairs officer explain to the press where showing the bottom of your shoe to a Muslim or shaking with your left hand was legitimate grounds for murder,” growled one US Army official.
They say their Muslim partners would still resent them even if they followed their Islamic protocols to the letter.
“The cultural affronts excuse is a bunch of garbage,” a senior US Army intelligence official told me. “The Afghans that know we’re doing all this PC cultural sensitivity crap are laughing their asses off at our stupidity.”
Explained the intelligence official: “They’re killing us because we’re ‘infidels’ occupying Islamic lands. It’s what the Koran and every imam over there is telling them, and no amount of cultural sensitivity is going to stop that or change the fact that we’re ‘infidels.’
Further pointing up the absurdity of putting troops through Islamic finishing school: The intelligence official notes that if there are any truly obnoxious cultural offenses, they are committed by Afghan trainees quartered inside our bases.
“They like to stand on our toilets and poop all over them,” he said.
Why? They refuse to touch the toilet seats used by the “dirty infidels” they’re training and living with.
YES, creep by creep, purge by purge – of patriotic officers and American ethos – has led to the ordering of U.S. troops to strip themselves of their religious and cultural heritage while fighting the Islamic enemy!
WHAT kind of American leaders behave this way? Asked and answered.
AND hot on its heels, another nail is hammered into the military’s (junior) coffin. Oh, please G-d, save the U.S. military from its wayward leaders!
After intervention by the Council on American Islamic Relations, the Defense Department reportedly decided it will now allow Muslim students participating in the Junior Reserve Officers’ Training Corps to wear headscarves and turbans while in uniform.
The decision marks the latest influence by controversial Islamic groups on military affairs.
WND previously broke the story that an Islamic group that has been closely tied to the Muslim Brotherhood and was named by the Justice Department as an unindicted co-conspirator in a scheme to raise money for Hamas is the official endorsing agency for the U.S. Armed Forces Muslim chaplain program.
The Islamic Society of North America, or ISNA, also runs regular events for the military’s Muslim chaplains.
WND also reported the Army’s Muslim chaplain program was founded by a terror-supporting convict while the Army’s first Islamic chaplain, who is still serving, has been associated with a charity widely accused of serving as an al-Qaida front.
On Thursday, CAIR announced its activism was responsible for the decision to allow Muslim garb in the JROTC.
The Islamic group got involved following an incident in October in which a Muslim teen, Demin Zawity, reportedly quit the JROTC when her commanding officer at a Brentwood, Tenn., high school would not allow her to wear her hijab in the homecoming parade.
CAIR sent a letter to Defense Secretary Leon Panetta requesting “constitutionally-protected religious accommodations for the girl and for future Muslim JROTC participants.”
Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army Larry Stubblefield responded to CAIR’s complaint by explaining the JROTC program will not allow religious headwear.
“Based on your concerns, the Army has reviewed its JROTC uniform policy and will develop appropriate procedures to provide Cadets the opportunity to request the wear of religious head dress, such as the turban and hijab,” Stubblefield wrote in the letter, made public by CAIR. “This change will allow Miss Zawity and other students the chance to fully participate in the JROTC program.”
While CAIR’s activism may have taken place outside the Army, there are terror-tied Islamic groups that act in full partnership with the U.S. military.
Terror co-conspirator vets military chaplains
Since the Muslim chaplain program’s inception in 1993, ISNA has been the official endorsing agency of the military’s new chaplains.
In 2005, ISNA initiated a yearly Muslim chaplain conference that includes leadership talks for chaplains in both the military and U.S. prison system.
Discover the Networks notes that ISNA –through its Saudi-government-backed affiliate the North American Islamic Trust – reportedly holds the mortgages on 50 percent to 80 percent of all mosques in the U.S. and Canada.
ISNA was founded in 1981 by the Saudi-funded Muslim Students’ Association, which was founded partially by the Muslim Brotherhood. The two groups are still partners….continue reading, if you dare.
A + B.
ALAS, like a full-barreling swathe of inter-connected trains careening into the abyss without the benefit of functioning brakes, so too – albeit, on a national scale – America is hurtling toward self-destruction. But while the eight year reign of terror under HUSSEIN Obama can also be described akin to frogs (slowly) boiling in water, it doesn’t negate the facts at hand.
THE fact remains that no one should feign shock….shock….that Islamic headscarves are now part and parcel of the U.S. army’s attire, a more than symbolic victory for Islam. Don’t ever forget this. In reality, had it not come about, well, THAT would have been surprising!
EVEN so, Washington’s capitulation surely doesn’t mean that millions upon millions of patriots – many of whom are either active duty or vets – have to sit still and stand for said infiltration and penetration of their military. To the contrary, even the so-called Commander-in-Chief has to pay for the crime of treason, regardless of this and that.
INCONTESTABLY, any symbols which Muslims view as an adherence to Shariah Law (even though it is highly debatable if headscarves etc are Koranic-based, but never mind all that) are in DIRECT violation of the Constitution!